Search:  

 Blog     e-Newsletter       Resource Library      Directories      Webinars     Apps
AFCEA logo
 

Intelligence Support to Critical Infrastructure Protection

Tuesday, November 25, 2008
AFCEA Intelligence

Critical infrastructures are essential to all of the necessary functions upon which society depends, but are largely taken for granted until those functions are disrupted. Events such as what took place at the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City in 1994, preparation for Y2K (2000), 9/11 and its aftermath, the 2003 blackout of the northeast, and the devastating hurricanes of 2006 and 2008, all have focused attention on the nation's infrastructure, reminding us how vulnerable these systems are and the diversity of threats they face. As the American people have been confronted with the possibility of living and working without one or more of the basic necessities on which they have come to depend, critical infrastructure protection has become a priority for the federal government, as well as for the private sector and state, local, and tribal governments. It follows, therefore, that providing support to the critical infrastructure mission also has become an important priority for the U.S. Intelligence Community. Criticisms leveled against the Intelligence Community following 9/11 included concerns about the manner and extent to which foreign intelligence could be used to protect the homeland. In addition, the national debate about information and intelligence sharing now has been extended to include threats to the nation's critical infrastructure. Accompanying this discussion have been moves to build a more unified Intelligence Community (including the reorganization required by the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004) and more recent changes to Executive Order 12333. These changes allow for stronger support to state, local, and tribal authorities and to the private sector – in terms of technical assistance – and remove some impediments to sharing information with those charged with the critical infrastructure protection mission. These are important steps, but are not sufficient to providing intelligence support to the critical infrastructure protection mission.

http://www.afcea.org/signal/articles/articlefiles/1783-FallIntel08_WhitePaperweb3.pdf

Comments

Page 5 indicates there are 17 CI/KR sectors; however, in March 2008, DHS identified and established "Critical Manufacturing" as an 18th CI/KR sector.

By LTC Jason Strickland

On pg. 11, the paper indicates there is "no formalized mechanism for articulating intelligence requirements for critical infrastructure..."
I submit there is a forum via the DHS National Infrastructure Coordinating Center (NICC) during crisis situations. Interested parties (be they privates sector, other government entities, etc.) submit RFIs to the NICC and the NICC coordinates the requirements. Granted, most of the RFIs are not intelligence requirements; however, there are several that deal directly with ISR (or Incident Awareness and Assessment [IAA], as we refer to here at USNORTHCOM.

By LTC Jason Strickland

P.10 talks about the value of information sharing and the ISACs. For critical infrastructures such as electric, oil/gas, water, chemicals, etc, the ISACS are not effective for information sharing concerning industrial control systems.

By Joe Weiss

1. There is a serious need to implement the Joint Doctrine Hierarchy-Based Common Operating Picture at every level of Gov and with every level of first responder/protection.

2. The entire community is failing to see this obvious solution.

By stephen.w.klein