Communications Convergence Breeds Opportunities
David Gergen, CNN commentator and an editor at-large for U.S. News and World Report, speaks at MILCOM 2009.
Future communications work viewed in light of looming budget constraints.
After decades of creating phenomenal information technology tools, the
Certain themes emerged throughout the MILCOM 2009 conference that have been heard during other
David Gergen, CNN commentator and editor at-large for U.S. News and World Report, led off the event by sharing his opinions about the impact both the president and Secretary of Defense Robert Gates have on the future of the military. President Obama trusts Gates a great deal, Gergen said, and the secretary is likely to influence not only the operations transition from
Gates already has taken several steps that are affecting the
Although Gates has been very influential in the specifics of warfighting, Gergen allowed that when it comes to
MILCOM’s first panel discussion brought to light the importance of the convergence of information technology capabilities for security during major events and in preparation for national emergencies. Representatives from both
Lt. Gen. Ted F. Bowlds, USAF, is the commander of the Electronic Systems Center.
Lt. Gen. Ted F. Bowlds, USAF, commander,
Some of the solutions to this procurement dilemma may be addressed by viewing them in a whole new way. Richard J. Byrne, president, command and control center, the MITRE Corporation, presented an explanation of complexity theory and how it applies to communication systems and their acquisition. His premise is that the individual components of complex systems create emergent behavior, which comprises cooperating, repeating and responding to results that result in unpredictable behavior.
It is because of this unpredictability that procurement officials must be willing to accept less than 100 percent solutions. Byrne pointed out that this already is taking place in current theaters of operation. At least 60 percent of the solutions the U.S. Army is using are not part of programs of record, he said. Although it has become a cliché, information technology professionals and procurement officers must think outside the box when developing and purchasing systems for the military, Byrne stated. They must keep in mind that each system brings its own solutions, problems and “personalities” into the mix, resulting in unexpected results, he added.
Lt. Gen. Dennis Via, USA, is the director, command, control, communications and computer systems, J-6, the Joint Staff.
Emergent behavior became obvious on the second day of the conference when Lt. Gen. Dennis Via,
Nowhere is this more obvious than in the focus shift from Iraq to Afghanistan, stated Brig. Gen. (P) Mark S. Bowman, USA, director of architecture, operations, networks and space, office of the chief information officer/G-6, U.S. Army. Up until now, 80 percent of the people, equipment and funding has been dedicated to operation Iraqi Freedom. Shifting focus and troops from
The Honorable Michael Chertoff is the chairman and managing principal, the Chertoff Group, and the former secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security.
During his speech at the Tuesday luncheon, the Honorable Michael Chertoff, former secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, proposed that it is strategic convergence that will distinguish the 21st century from the 20th century. Using a binary system as an analogy, Chertoff spoke about the differences between both the threats the
The most obvious example is the change from facing a single adversary to an enemy that is diverse yet networked. “When I look at our adversaries around the world, what I see is that we can no longer kid ourselves into believing that we face challenges that will be easily boxed based on regions and categories. We have got to tear the categories down and recognize that every threat we face can appear simultaneously as a military threat, a terrorism threat, a criminal threat and a community threat that directly impacts our civilian governments,” he stated.
But the analogy can be extended to the difference between how the
Adm. Thad W. Allen, USCG, is the commandant of the U.S. Coast Guard.
During Wednesday’s keynote address, Adm. Thad W. Allen, USCG, commandant, U.S. Coast Guard, proposed that today’s social media tools present the opportunity to address both budget constraints and the need for constant communications. “We have to understand that the changes in technology, computation and so forth have created what I call a fundamental change in our social atmosphere.... I have said on many occasions that this is not just a change in technology; this is not a new product line; this is not a new way of marketing technology. This is a fundamental change in our social atmosphere that is as fundamental as climate change is to our environment,” Adm. Allen said.
Military leaders must adapt and understand social media so they can assess both the risks and the opportunities they present, he added. “You have to proactively make information available to your people. The more you can make information transparent, the more you’re going to breed self-correcting behavior into your organizations,” Adm. Allen stated.
Information sharing also was the topic of discussion of panelists talking about network centricity and coalitions. With the shift to operations in
For example, the French Thales Group has been instrumental in ensuring that multinational troops can communicate with each other over the vast and complicated terrain in
Tony Montemarano is the component acquisition executive for the Defense Information Systems Agency.
Tony Montemarano, component acquisition executive, Defense Information Systems Agency, passionately explained how important convergence has become to his organization specifically and to the
Montemarano agrees with many others that technology is not standing in the way of true convergence. Instead, it is the culture of the enormous number of organizations that must communicate and share information that is the biggest hurdle to overcome. It is imperative that top-level leaders in every organization accept change and ensure that their personnel integrate change into the way they work and the way they conduct business, he said.
WEB RESOURCES
MILCOM 2009: www.milcom.org
Additional MILCOM 2009 coverage: www.afcea.org/signal/signalscape/index.php/tag/milcom09/